Introduction With both the old $1797 Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G and the new $2397 Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E currently available in the Nikkor lineup, the latest version brings a number of feature updates. As denoted by the E in the name, the new 24-70mm f/2.8E includes Nikon’s electromagnetic diaphragm, which the manufacturer claims enables more The Nikon 70-200mm ƒ/2.8G AF-S ED VR II is a large and heavy lens - slightly shorter than the previous version (209mm instead of 216mm), but slightly heavier (1,540 grams instead of 1,450 grams). From available sharpness charts and measurements one can derive that Nikon 60 mm f/2.8G is sharper at f/2.8 compared to 24-70 mm at f/2.8. It has also superior corner performance. Tamron for example is suffering from focus breathing at close distance therefore, as a result, both lenses will be very close considering maximum range for zoom. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II vs. Nikon AF-S 70-200mm F2.8E FL ED VR vs. Sigma 70-200 F2.8 DG OS HSM vs. Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM vs. Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II vs. Tamron SP 70-200 F2.8 G2 120-300mm f/2.8E. 180-400mm f/4E. 300mm f/4E. 400mm f/2.8E, 500mm f/4E, 500mm f/5.6E PF, and 600mm f/4E. All that said, Nikon does not claim weather-proof or water-proof for any of their lenses that I know of, other than the AW lens series for the AW1 camera. As lenses get more and more electronics and motors in them, this can be a bit Intro. The AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED is Nikon’s professional f2.8 standard zoom. It covers a 2.9x zoom-range and was announced August 2007. It’s the successor to the AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8D ED and like its predecessor compatible with full-frame DSLRs. Its gold-ring, constant f2.8 aperture, and a price-tag of around 1500 EUR put it 2P7mBc. Need advise. I am going to buy Nikon Z6 Mirroless camera and I already own NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Lens. Should I buy the native Z 24-70mm f/4 S lens ? It is a good price as a kit lens. I am already buying FTZ mount as I have some other old lens too. Thanks for your reply in advance. It's an easy question to answer - just get the 24-70 S. The fast, ultra-wide-angle AF-S Zoom-NIKKOR 14–24mm f/2.8G ED is optimized for edge-to-edge sharpness on both FX- and DX-format Nikon D-SLR cameras. It combines the latest Nikon lens technologies, innovations in optical design and the rich heritage of NIKKOR glass to deliver truly superlative performance in any situation. As expected from the above sharpness numbers, the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL VR performs very well with all three teleconverters. The Nikon TC-14E III teleconverter has very little impact on lens sharpness, so if you want to extend the reach of the lens to 98-280mm focal length, definitely add the 1.4x TC to your camera bag. The Nikon TC-17E II The AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4 has a lot more distortion than the AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8 at both ends of its range, with a generous amount of barrel distortion at 70mm and pincushion distortion at 200mm. The AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8 is almost neutral at 70mm and has just a bit of pincushion distortion at 200mm; 6. Why is Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F/2.8G ED VR II better than Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F/4G ED VR? 30% wider aperture at minimum focal length The previous lens is the Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G AF-S ED at £1199, but personally I feel that the added VR and improved optical design could well be worth the difference.

nikkor 24 70 f2 8g ed